Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)
Purpose
The Geriatric Depression
Scale (GDS) is a self-rating screening
tool developed to detect depression
in elderly individuals (Yesavage et al., 1983).
In-Depth Review
Purpose of the measure
The Geriatric Depression
Scale (GDS) is a self-rating screening
tool developed to detect depression
in elderly individuals (Yesavage et al., 1983). The GDS is comprised of 30 items that were selected by researchers and clinicians for their validity
in distinguishing groups of elderly people with depression
from the general population (McDowell & Newell, 1996). Questions were developed to be non-threatening and age-appropriate and require respondents to answer using yes or no (Stiles & McGarrahan, 1998).
Available versions
- Geriatric DepressionIllness involving the body, mood, and thoughts, that affects the way a person eats and sleeps, the way one feels about oneself, and the way one thinks about things. A depressive disorder is not the same as a passing blue mood or a sign of personal weakness or a condition that can be wished away. People with a depressive disease cannot merely “pull themselves together” and get better. Without treatment, symptoms can last for weeks, months, or years. Appropriate treatment, however, can help most people with depression.
Scale (GDS) - Geriatric DepressionIllness involving the body, mood, and thoughts, that affects the way a person eats and sleeps, the way one feels about oneself, and the way one thinks about things. A depressive disorder is not the same as a passing blue mood or a sign of personal weakness or a condition that can be wished away. People with a depressive disease cannot merely “pull themselves together” and get better. Without treatment, symptoms can last for weeks, months, or years. Appropriate treatment, however, can help most people with depression.
Scale – Short Form (GDS-SF)
Short forms of the GDS with 1, 3, 4, 10 and 15 questions have been developed (compared to the 30 questions as seen in the original form of the scale). The short forms were developed in response to criticism that the original form of the GDS was too lengthy and time intensive to administer thus making it impractical in primary care settings (van Marwijk et al., 1995).
While many of the shortened versions of the GDS have been found to be highly correlated with the original, the short forms tend to have higher negative predictive values suggesting that the short forms might be best suited to screeningTesting for disease in people without symptoms.
out patients with possible depressionIllness involving the body, mood, and thoughts, that affects the way a person eats and sleeps, the way one feels about oneself, and the way one thinks about things. A depressive disorder is not the same as a passing blue mood or a sign of personal weakness or a condition that can be wished away. People with a depressive disease cannot merely “pull themselves together” and get better. Without treatment, symptoms can last for weeks, months, or years. Appropriate treatment, however, can help most people with depression.
van Marwijk et al., 1995; Almeida & Almeida, 1999).
Note: There are many different short-forms comprised of different sets of questions making comparisons difficult between studies and groups (Teasell, Foley & Salter, 2011). The 15-item short form is the most commonly used short form and will be the focus of short forms reviewed in this module.
15-item GDS:
It requires approximately 5 to 7 minutes to administer.
The client must choose the best answer (yes or no) for how they have felt over the past week:
- Are you basically satisfied with your life?
- Have you dropped many of your activitiesAs defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, activity is the performance of a task or action by an individual. Activity limitations are difficulties in performance of activities. These are also referred to as function.
and interests? - Do you feel that your life is empty?
- Do you often get bored?
- Are you in good spirits most of the time?
- Are you afraid that something bad is going to happen to you?
- Do you feel happy most of the time?
- Do you often feel helpless?
- Do you prefer to stay at home, rather than going out and doing new things?
- Do you feel you have more problems with memory than most?
- Do you think it’s wonderful to be alive now?
- Do you feel pretty worthless the way you are now?
- Do you feel full of energy?
- Do you feel that your situation is hopeless?
- Do you think that most people are better off than you are?
A score of > 3 points is suggestive of post-stroke depression
.
A score of > 5 points is suggestive of depression
.
A score of > 10 points is almost always indicative of depression
(Sheik & Yesavage,1986).
Features of the measure
Items:
The original GDS is comprised of 30-items in which the participant is asked to respond by answering “yes” or “no” in reference to how they felt on the day of administration.
What to consider before beginning:
The GDS can be self-reported or administered orally. However it should be awknowledged that oral administration may result in the endorsement of fewer items when compared to the self-administered method (Cannon et al., 2002). The need to provide an answer aloud may discourage some respondents from providing an answer they may consider embarrassing (Williams, Rittman, Boylstein, Faircloth & Haijing. 2005).
Gender has been found to have an effect on the ability of the GDS to correctly classify individuals. The GDS has been reported to be more accurate in classifying women as depressed than men. In the case of male respondents, there tend to be more false negatives (Stiles & McGarrahan, 1998).
Scoring and score interpretation:
The respondent is to provide responses (“yes” or “no”) to each question with reference to the past week. One point is given for each “yes” response and the number of points is summed to provide a single score.
- Scores from 0 to 10 are considered normal
- Scores > 11 indicate depressionIllness involving the body, mood, and thoughts, that affects the way a person eats and sleeps, the way one feels about oneself, and the way one thinks about things. A depressive disorder is not the same as a passing blue mood or a sign of personal weakness or a condition that can be wished away. People with a depressive disease cannot merely “pull themselves together” and get better. Without treatment, symptoms can last for weeks, months, or years. Appropriate treatment, however, can help most people with depression.
- Scores between 11 and 20 indicate mild depressionIllness involving the body, mood, and thoughts, that affects the way a person eats and sleeps, the way one feels about oneself, and the way one thinks about things. A depressive disorder is not the same as a passing blue mood or a sign of personal weakness or a condition that can be wished away. People with a depressive disease cannot merely “pull themselves together” and get better. Without treatment, symptoms can last for weeks, months, or years. Appropriate treatment, however, can help most people with depression.
- Scores between 21 and 30 indicate moderate depressionIllness involving the body, mood, and thoughts, that affects the way a person eats and sleeps, the way one feels about oneself, and the way one thinks about things. A depressive disorder is not the same as a passing blue mood or a sign of personal weakness or a condition that can be wished away. People with a depressive disease cannot merely “pull themselves together” and get better. Without treatment, symptoms can last for weeks, months, or years. Appropriate treatment, however, can help most people with depression.
(Brink et al.,1982; McDowell & Newell, 1996).
Time:
The test requires approximately 8-10 minutes to complete in self-administered format (McDowell & Newell, 1996). Due to the number of questions and length of time to administer, it has been suggested that the use of the GDS as a screeningTesting for disease in people without symptoms.
tool is impractical in primary care settings (van Marwijk et al., 1995). Many shortened forms of the GDS have been developed to address this potential challenge.
Training requirements:
No additional training is required to administer the GDS (Teasell, Foley & Salter, 2011).
Subscales:
There are no subscales reported for this measure.
Equipment:
A copy of the measure and a pen or a pencil.
Alternative form of the assessment
Geriatric Depression
Scale – Short Forms (GDS-SF)
Client suitability
Can be used with:
- Geriatric patients with strokeAlso called a “brain attack” and happens when brain cells die because of inadequate blood flow. 20% of cases are a hemorrhage in the brain caused by a rupture or leakage from a blood vessel. 80% of cases are also know as a “schemic stroke”, or the formation of a blood clot in a vessel supplying blood to the brain.
- Geriatric patients in in-patient, out-patient and nursing home settings (Rinaldi et al., 2003)
- Patients who require a proxy to complete
- Clients with aphasiaAphasia is an acquired disorder caused by an injury to the brain and affects a person’s ability to communicate. It is most often the result of stroke or head injury.
An individual with aphasia may experience difficulty expressing themselves when speaking, difficulty understanding the speech of others, and difficulty reading and writing. Sadly, aphasia can mask a person’s intelligence and ability to communicate feelings, thoughts and emotions. (The Aphasia Institute, Canada): Suggestion by Dr. Rita Hargrave is to use a point-board, or a board with the scale and yes/no next to the items and have patient point out correct answer.
Should not be used with:
- Clients with poor reading comprehension and visual ability in the self-administered format. However, in the case of illiteracy or poor vision, the items and possible responses may be read to the respondent.
- Clients who have more than a moderate cognitive impairment (McDowell & Newell, 1996; McGivney et al., 1994; Stiles & McGarrahan, 1998).
Languages of the measure
The GDS has been adapted and translated, but not necessarily validated, into following languages:
Arabic, Brazilian, Chinese, Creole, Danish, Dutch, Farsi, French, German, Greek, Hebrew, Hindi, Hungarian, Icelandic, Irish, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Lithuania, Malay, Maltse, Norwegian, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Serbian, Spanish, Swedish. Thai, Turkish, Vietnamese, Welsh and Yiddish.
Summary
What does the tool measure? | Depression in geriatric patients. |
What types of clients can the tool be used for? | Adults over the age of 65 years. Can be used with, but is not limited to, clients with stroke |
Is this a screening or assessment tool? |
Screening tool. |
Time to administer | 8-10 minutes to administer |
Versions | Geriatric Depression Scale – Short Form (GDS-SF) |
Other Languages | Arabic, Brazilian, Chinese, Creole, Danish, Dutch, Farsi, French, German, Greek, Hebrew, Hindi, Hungarian, Icelandic, Irish, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Lithuania, Malay, Maltse, Norwegian, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Serbian, Spanish, Swedish. Thai, Turkish, Vietnamese, Welsh and Yiddish. |
Measurement Properties | |
Reliability |
Internal Consistency Two studies examined the internal consistency Test-retest: |
Validity |
Convergent: One study examined the convergent validity between the GDS and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRS-D) and the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS). Excellent correlation between the GDS and both measures were found. |
Floor/Ceiling Effects | No studies have examined the floor or ceiling effects of the GDS. |
Does the tool detect change in patients? | Not applicable. |
Acceptability | The items were developed specifically for an elderly population. The yes/no response format is easy to understand and familiar. |
Feasibility | The GDS is easy to administer and requires no additional training. The GDS-SF may be more practical for use in primary care settings. When used as a screening tool, the GDS performs as well as some longer interview-based assessments but requires much less time and training to administer. |
How to obtain the tool? |
A copy of the English GDS and the 15-item GDS can be obtained from the following website: http://www.stanford.edu/~yesavage/GDS.html |
Psychometric Properties
Overview
There is an abundance of research on the psychometric properties of the various GDS short-forms. However, little research has been conducted specifically in patients with stroke
studies as content to be summarized and presented here.
Floor/Ceiling Effects
No studies have reported on the floor or ceiling effects of the GDS.
Reliability
Internal constancy:
Yesavage and Brink (1983) examined the internal consistencyA method of measuring reliability . Internal consistency reflects the extent to which items of a test measure various aspects of the same characteristic and nothing else. Internal consistency coefficients can take on values from 0 to 1. Higher values represent higher levels of internal consistency. of the GDS in the original validation study involving elderly patients with depressionIllness involving the body, mood, and thoughts, that affects the way a person eats and sleeps, the way one feels about oneself, and the way one thinks about things. A depressive disorder is not the same as a passing blue mood or a sign of personal weakness or a condition that can be wished away. People with a depressive disease cannot merely “pull themselves together” and get better. Without treatment, symptoms can last for weeks, months, or years. Appropriate treatment, however, can help most people with depression.
and healthy controls. The internal consistencyA method of measuring reliability . Internal consistency reflects the extent to which items of a test measure various aspects of the same characteristic and nothing else. Internal consistency coefficients can take on values from 0 to 1. Higher values represent higher levels of internal consistency. was excellent (alpha = 0.94).
Agrell and O’Dehlin (1989) examined the internal consistencyA method of measuring reliability . Internal consistency reflects the extent to which items of a test measure various aspects of the same characteristic and nothing else. Internal consistency coefficients can take on values from 0 to 1. Higher values represent higher levels of internal consistency. of the GDS used as a screeningTesting for disease in people without symptoms.
test for post-stroke depressionIllness involving the body, mood, and thoughts, that affects the way a person eats and sleeps, the way one feels about oneself, and the way one thinks about things. A depressive disorder is not the same as a passing blue mood or a sign of personal weakness or a condition that can be wished away. People with a depressive disease cannot merely “pull themselves together” and get better. Without treatment, symptoms can last for weeks, months, or years. Appropriate treatment, however, can help most people with depression.
. The internal consistencyA method of measuring reliability . Internal consistency reflects the extent to which items of a test measure various aspects of the same characteristic and nothing else. Internal consistency coefficients can take on values from 0 to 1. Higher values represent higher levels of internal consistency. was excellent (alpha = 0.90).
Test-retest:
Yesavage and Brink (1983) examined the test-retest reliabilityA way of estimating the reliability of a scale in which individuals are administered the same scale on two different occasions and then the two scores are assessed for consistency. This method of evaluating reliability is appropriate only if the phenomenon that the scale measures is known to be stable over the interval between assessments. If the phenomenon being measured fluctuates substantially over time, then the test-retest paradigm may significantly underestimate reliability. In using test-retest reliability, the investigator needs to take into account the possibility of practice effects, which can artificially inflate the estimate of reliability (National Multiple Sclerosis Society).
of the GDS in the original validation study. Twenty subjects completed the questionnaire twice, with one week in between each completion. Test-retest reliabilityA way of estimating the reliability of a scale in which individuals are administered the same scale on two different occasions and then the two scores are assessed for consistency. This method of evaluating reliability is appropriate only if the phenomenon that the scale measures is known to be stable over the interval between assessments. If the phenomenon being measured fluctuates substantially over time, then the test-retest paradigm may significantly underestimate reliability. In using test-retest reliability, the investigator needs to take into account the possibility of practice effects, which can artificially inflate the estimate of reliability (National Multiple Sclerosis Society).
was found to be excellent (ICC = 0.84, p<0.001).
Intra-rater:
No studies have reported on the intra-rater reliabilityThis is a type of reliability assessment in which the same assessment is completed by the same rater on two or more occasions. These different ratings are then compared, generally by means of correlation. Since the same individual is completing both assessments, the rater’s subsequent ratings are contaminated by knowledge of earlier ratings.
of the GDS with patients with stroke
Inter-rater:
No studies have reported on the inter-rater reliability
of the GDS with patients with stroke
Validity
Content:
No studies have reported on the content validityRefers to the extent to which a measure represents all aspects of a given social concept. Example: A depression scale may lack content validity if it only assesses the affective dimension of depression but fails to take into account the behavioral dimension.
of the GDS with patients with strokeAlso called a “brain attack” and happens when brain cells die because of inadequate blood flow. 20% of cases are a hemorrhage in the brain caused by a rupture or leakage from a blood vessel. 80% of cases are also know as a “schemic stroke”, or the formation of a blood clot in a vessel supplying blood to the brain..
Criterion:
Concurrent:
No studies have reported on the concurrent validityTo validate a new measure, the results of the measure are compared to the results of the gold standard obtained at approximately the same point in time (concurrently), so they both reflect the same construct. This approach is useful in situations when a new or untested tool is potentially more efficient, easier to administer, more practical, or safer than another more established method and is being proposed as an alternative instrument. See also “gold standard.”
of the GDS with patients with strokeAlso called a “brain attack” and happens when brain cells die because of inadequate blood flow. 20% of cases are a hemorrhage in the brain caused by a rupture or leakage from a blood vessel. 80% of cases are also know as a “schemic stroke”, or the formation of a blood clot in a vessel supplying blood to the brain..
Predictive:
No studies have reported on the predictive validityA form of criterion validity that examines a measure’s ability to predict some subsequent event. Example: can the Berg Balance Scale predict falls over the following 6 weeks? The criterion standard in this example would be whether the patient fell over the next 6 weeks.
of the GDS with patients with strokeAlso called a “brain attack” and happens when brain cells die because of inadequate blood flow. 20% of cases are a hemorrhage in the brain caused by a rupture or leakage from a blood vessel. 80% of cases are also know as a “schemic stroke”, or the formation of a blood clot in a vessel supplying blood to the brain..
Construct:
Convergent/Discriminant:
Yesavage and Brink (1983) examined the convergent validityA type of validity that is determined by hypothesizing and examining the overlap between two or more tests that presumably measure the same construct. In other words, convergent validity is used to evaluate the degree to which two or more measures that theoretically should be related to each other are, in fact, observed to be related to each other.
between the GDS and the Hamilton Rating Scale for DepressionIllness involving the body, mood, and thoughts, that affects the way a person eats and sleeps, the way one feels about oneself, and the way one thinks about things. A depressive disorder is not the same as a passing blue mood or a sign of personal weakness or a condition that can be wished away. People with a depressive disease cannot merely “pull themselves together” and get better. Without treatment, symptoms can last for weeks, months, or years. Appropriate treatment, however, can help most people with depression.
(HRS-D) and the Zung Self-Rating DepressionIllness involving the body, mood, and thoughts, that affects the way a person eats and sleeps, the way one feels about oneself, and the way one thinks about things. A depressive disorder is not the same as a passing blue mood or a sign of personal weakness or a condition that can be wished away. People with a depressive disease cannot merely “pull themselves together” and get better. Without treatment, symptoms can last for weeks, months, or years. Appropriate treatment, however, can help most people with depression.
Scale (SDS). Excellent correlations between the GDS and both the HRS-D (0.83, p<0.001) and SDS (0.84, p<0.001) were found.
Known Groups:
No studies have reporte on the known groups validityKnown groups validity is a form of construct validation in which the validity is determined by the degree to which an instrument can demonstate different scores for groups know to vary on the variables being measured.
of the GDS with patients with strokeAlso called a “brain attack” and happens when brain cells die because of inadequate blood flow. 20% of cases are a hemorrhage in the brain caused by a rupture or leakage from a blood vessel. 80% of cases are also know as a “schemic stroke”, or the formation of a blood clot in a vessel supplying blood to the brain..
SensitivitySensitivity refers to the probability that a diagnostic technique will detect a particular disease or condition when it does indeed exist in a patient (National Multiple Sclerosis Society). See also “Specificity.”
/Specificity:
Agrell and Dehlin (1989) examined the sensitivity
and specificity
for identifying depression
of the GDS in 40 geriatric patients with stroke
was confirmed using a clinical examination and psychiatric interview. A GDS score of >10 was found to have good sensitivity
and moderate specificity
for detecting any depression
(88% and 64% respectively). Based on these results, the GDS can be used as a brief screening
measure for assessing depression
in geriatric patients with stroke
Almeida and Almeida (1999) examined the sensitivity
and specificity
of the 15-item GDS (and other short form versions) for identifying a major depressive episode in 64 patients, according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). Using a cutoff score of 4/5 for the 15-item GDS produced a sensitivity
and specificity
of 97% and 54.8% respectively (with a positive predictive value of 69.6% and negative predictive value of 94.4%).
Rinaldi et al. (2003) examined the sensitivity
and specificity
of the 5-item and 15-item GDS in 181 geriatric patients (>65 years). A diagnosis of depression
was made using a neuropsychological evaluation administered by a geriatrician using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for depression
. A score of > 5 on the 15-item GDS had a sensitivity
of 0.92 and specificity
of 0.83 for detecting depression
.
Tang et al. (2003) evaluated an alternative language version of the GDS in 127 Chinese geriatric patients with acute stroke
were made by a psychiatrist who conducted the Structured Clinical Interview Diagnosis from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth edition (DSM-IV). Using an optimal cut-off score of 6/7 the sensitivity
, specificity
, positive and negative predictive values were 89, 73, 37, 98 and 90% respectively.
Responsiveness
Not applicable as the GDS is a screeningTesting for disease in people without symptoms.
tool.
References
- Agrell, B. & Dehlin, O. (1989). Comparison of six depression rating scales in geriatric stroke patients. Stroke, 20, 1190-1194.
- Almeida, O.P. & Almeida, S.A. (1999). Short versions of the geriatric depression scale: A study of their validity for the diagnosis of a major depressive episode according to ICD-10 and DSM-IV. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14, 858-865.
- Brink, T.L., Yesavage, J.A., Lum, O., Heersema, P.H., Adey, M. & Rose, T.L. (1982). Screening tests for geriatric depression. Clinical Gerontologist, 1, 37-43.
- Cannon, B.J., Thaler. T. & Roos, s. (2002). Oral versus written administration of the Geriatric Depression Scale. Aging and Mental Health, 6(4), 418-422.
- McDowell, I. & Newell, C. (1996). Measuring health. A guide to rating scales and questionnaires., 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
- McGivney, S.A.,Mulvihill, M. & Taylor, B. (1994). Validating the GDS depression screen in the nursing home. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 42(5), 490-492.
- Rinaldi, P., Mecocci, P., Benedetti, C et al. (2003). Validation of the five-item geriatric depression scale in elderly subject in three different settings. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51, 694-698.
- Sheik, J. & Yesavage, J. (1986). Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): recent findings and development of a shorter version. In: Brink TL (ed.), Clinical Gerontology: A guide to assessment and intervention. New York, NY: Howarth Press.
- Stiles, P.G. & McGarrahan, J.E. (1998). The Geriatric Depression Scale: A comprehensive review. Journal of Clinical Geropsychology, 4, 89-109.
- Tang, W.K., Chan, S.S.M., Chiu, H.F.K., Kwok, T.C.Y, Mok, V. & Ungvari, G.S. (2004). Can the Geriatric Depression Scale detect post-stroke depression in the Chinese elderly. Journal of Affective Disorders, 81(2), 153-156.
- Teasell, R., Foley, N. C., & Salter K. (2011). EBRSR: Evidence-Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation. 13th ed. London (ON): EBRSR.
- van Marwijk, H., Wallace, P., De Bock, G.H., Hermans, J., Kaptein, A. & Mulder, J.D. (1995). Evaluation of the feasibility, reliability and diagnostic value of shortened versions of the Geriatric Depression Scale. British Journal of General Practice, 45, 195-199.
- Williams, C.L., Rittman, M.R., Boylstein, C., Faircloth, C. & Haijing, Q. (2005). Qualitative and quantitative measurement of depression in veterans recovering from stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Res Dev, 42, 277-290.
- Yesavage, J.A., Brink, T.L. (1983). Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17, 37-49.
See the measure
How to obtain the GDS?
A copy of the English GDS and the 15-item GDS can be obtained from the following website: http://www.stanford.edu/~yesavage/GDS.html
Note: Links to some of the other language versions can also be found on this page.
Click HERE for the Stroke
Scale