Disability Assessment Scale (DAS)
Purpose
The Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) evaluates upper limb functional disability in patients with spasticity following stroke
In-Depth Review
Purpose of the measure
The Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) evaluates upper-limb functional disability in patients with spasticity
following stroke
.
Available versions
None reported.
Features of the measure
Items:
- Hand hygiene
- Extent of palm maceration, ulceration or infection.
- Cleanliness of the palm, ease of cleaning, nail trimming.
- Effect of hygiene-related disability on other areas of functioning.
- Dressing
- Ability to dress.
- Effect of dressing-related disability on other areas of functioning.
- Limb position abnormality.
- Amount of abnormal limb position.
- Pain
- Intensity of pain or discomfort related to upper-limb spasticity
Involuntary muscle tightness and stiffness that can occur after a stroke. It is characterized by exaggerated deep tendon reflexes that interfere with muscular activity, gait, movement, or speech. Spasticity can increase initially but wane down later on, after stroke.
. - Interference with activities
As defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, activity is the performance of a task or action by an individual. Activity limitations are difficulties in performance of activities. These are also referred to as function.
of daily living.
- Intensity of pain or discomfort related to upper-limb spasticity
Description of tasks:
Patients are interviewed to determine the extent of functional impairment for the following 4 areas:
- Hygiene: The rater assesses the extent of palm maceration, ulceration, or infection; cleanliness of the palm, ease of cleaning, and nail trimming; and the effect of hygiene-related disability on other areas of functioning.
- Dressing: The rater assess the patient’s ability to dress and the effect of dressing-related disability on other areas of functioning.
- Limb position: The rater assesses the amount of abnormal position of the limb; and
- Pain: The rater assesses the intensity of pain or discomfort related to upper-limb spasticity
Involuntary muscle tightness and stiffness that can occur after a stroke. It is characterized by exaggerated deep tendon reflexes that interfere with muscular activity, gait, movement, or speech. Spasticity can increase initially but wane down later on, after stroke.
and interference with activitiesAs defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, activity is the performance of a task or action by an individual. Activity limitations are difficulties in performance of activities. These are also referred to as function.
of daily living.
Scoring and Score Interpretation:
The DAS Scale uses a 4-point rating scale according to the following criteria:
- 0 – no disability.
- 1 – mild disability (noticeable but does not interfere significantly with normal activities
As defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, activity is the performance of a task or action by an individual. Activity limitations are difficulties in performance of activities. These are also referred to as function.
. - 2 – moderate disability (normal activities
As defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, activity is the performance of a task or action by an individual. Activity limitations are difficulties in performance of activities. These are also referred to as function.
require increased effort and/or assistance). - 3 – severe disability (normal activities
As defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, activity is the performance of a task or action by an individual. Activity limitations are difficulties in performance of activities. These are also referred to as function.
limited).
Time:
Not typically reported.
Training requirements:
None reported.
Subscales:
None
Equipment:
None reported.
Alternative Forms of the Disability Assessment Scale
None reported.
Client suitability
Can be used with:
- Clients with stroke
Also called a "brain attack" and happens when brain cells die because of inadequate blood flow. 20% of cases are a hemorrhage in the brain caused by a rupture or leakage from a blood vessel. 80% of cases are also know as a "schemic stroke", or the formation of a blood clot in a vessel supplying blood to the brain. with spasticity Involuntary muscle tightness and stiffness that can occur after a stroke. It is characterized by exaggerated deep tendon reflexes that interfere with muscular activity, gait, movement, or speech. Spasticity can increase initially but wane down later on, after stroke.
.
Should not be used with:
- Clients without spasticity
Involuntary muscle tightness and stiffness that can occur after a stroke. It is characterized by exaggerated deep tendon reflexes that interfere with muscular activity, gait, movement, or speech. Spasticity can increase initially but wane down later on, after stroke.
.
Languages of the measure
None reported.
Summary
What does the tool measure? | Functional disability in patients with spasticityInvoluntary muscle tightness and stiffness that can occur after a stroke. It is characterized by exaggerated deep tendon reflexes that interfere with muscular activity, gait, movement, or speech. Spasticity can increase initially but wane down later on, after stroke. . |
What types of clients can the tool be used for? | The Disability Assessment Scale can be used with, but is not limited to clients with post-strokespasticity. |
Is this a screeningTesting for disease in people without symptoms. or assessment tool? |
Assessment |
Time to administer | Not reported |
Versions | None |
Other Languages | None |
Measurement Properties | |
ReliabilityReliability can be defined in a variety of ways. It is generally understood to be the extent to which a measure is stable or consistent and produces similar results when administered repeatedly. A more technical definition of reliability is that it is the proportion of "true" variation in scores derived from a particular measure. The total variation in any given score may be thought of as consisting of true variation (the variation of interest) and error variation (which includes random error as well as systematic error). True variation is that variation which actually reflects differences in the construct under study, e.g., the actual severity of neurological impairment. Random error refers to "noise" in the scores due to chance factors, e.g., a loud noise distracts a patient thus affecting his performance, which, in turn, affects the score. Systematic error refers to bias that influences scores in a specific direction in a fairly consistent way, e.g., one neurologist in a group tends to rate all patients as being more disabled than do other neurologists in the group. There are many variations on the measurement of reliability including alternate-forms, internal consistency , inter-rater agreement , intra-rater agreement , and test-retest . |
Intra-rater: One study examined the intra-rater reliabilityThis is a type of reliability assessment in which the same assessment is completed by the same rater on two or more occasions. These different ratings are then compared, generally by means of correlation. Since the same individual is completing both assessments, the rater's subsequent ratings are contaminated by knowledge of earlier ratings. of the DAS in patients with spasticityInvoluntary muscle tightness and stiffness that can occur after a stroke. It is characterized by exaggerated deep tendon reflexes that interfere with muscular activity, gait, movement, or speech. Spasticity can increase initially but wane down later on, after stroke. following strokeAlso called a "brain attack" and happens when brain cells die because of inadequate blood flow. 20% of cases are a hemorrhage in the brain caused by a rupture or leakage from a blood vessel. 80% of cases are also know as a "schemic stroke", or the formation of a blood clot in a vessel supplying blood to the brain. and found adequate to excellent intra-rater reliabilityThis is a type of reliability assessment in which the same assessment is completed by the same rater on two or more occasions. These different ratings are then compared, generally by means of correlation. Since the same individual is completing both assessments, the rater's subsequent ratings are contaminated by knowledge of earlier ratings. . Inter-rater: |
ValidityThe degree to which an assessment measures what it is supposed to measure. |
No studies have examined the validityThe degree to which an assessment measures what it is supposed to measure. of the DAS. |
Floor/Ceiling Effects | No studies have examined the floor/ceiling effects of the DAS. |
Does the tool detect change in patients? | The responsivenessThe ability of an instrument to detect clinically important change over time. of the DAS has not formally been studied, however the DAS has been used to measure change in spasiticity in a clinical trial with patients with stroke |
Acceptability | The DAS is one of the only tools available for evaluation of upper limb functional disability in patients with spasticityInvoluntary muscle tightness and stiffness that can occur after a stroke. It is characterized by exaggerated deep tendon reflexes that interfere with muscular activity, gait, movement, or speech. Spasticity can increase initially but wane down later on, after stroke. following strokeAlso called a "brain attack" and happens when brain cells die because of inadequate blood flow. 20% of cases are a hemorrhage in the brain caused by a rupture or leakage from a blood vessel. 80% of cases are also know as a "schemic stroke", or the formation of a blood clot in a vessel supplying blood to the brain.. |
Feasibility | There is a lack of information about the DAS, affecting ease of administration. |
How to obtain the tool? | See: Brashear, A., Zafonte, R., Corcoran, M., Galvez-Jimenez, N., Gracies, J-M., Gordon, M.F., et al. (2002). Inter- and Intrarater reliabilityReliability can be defined in a variety of ways. It is generally understood to be the extent to which a measure is stable or consistent and produces similar results when administered repeatedly. A more technical definition of reliability is that it is the proportion of "true" variation in scores derived from a particular measure. The total variation in any given score may be thought of as consisting of true variation (the variation of interest) and error variation (which includes random error as well as systematic error). True variation is that variation which actually reflects differences in the construct under study, e.g., the actual severity of neurological impairment. Random error refers to "noise" in the scores due to chance factors, e.g., a loud noise distracts a patient thus affecting his performance, which, in turn, affects the score. Systematic error refers to bias that influences scores in a specific direction in a fairly consistent way, e.g., one neurologist in a group tends to rate all patients as being more disabled than do other neurologists in the group. There are many variations on the measurement of reliability including alternate-forms, internal consistency , inter-rater agreement , intra-rater agreement , and test-retest . of the Ashworth Scale and the Disability Assessment Scale in patients with upper-limb poststroke spasticityInvoluntary muscle tightness and stiffness that can occur after a stroke. It is characterized by exaggerated deep tendon reflexes that interfere with muscular activity, gait, movement, or speech. Spasticity can increase initially but wane down later on, after stroke. . Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 83, 1349-1351. |
Psychometric Properties
Overview
A literature search was conducted to identify all relevant publications on the psychometric properties of the Disability Assessment Scale when used with patients with stroke
and validity
of the DAS for use with patients following stroke
Floor/Ceiling Effects
No studies were identified examining the floor/ceiling effects of the DAS.
Reliability
Internal consistency
No studies have examined the internal consistency
Test-retest:
No studies have examined the test-retest reliability
of the DAS.
Intra-rater:
Brashear et al. (2002) investigated the intra-rater reliability
of the DAS in nine patients with spasticity
following stroke
, as calculated using overall weighted kappa scores, was adequate to excellent (k=0.520, 0.530, 0.775 and 0.776 for hygiene, dressing, limb position and pain respectively).
Inter-rater:
Brashear et al. (2002) investigated the inter-rater reliability
of the DAS in nine patients with spasticity following stroke
, as calculated using Kendall’s W, was adequate to excellent (Kendall’s W=0.494, 0.557, 0.626 and 0.772 for dressing, limb position, hygiene, and pain respectively).
Validity
Content:
No studies have examined the content validity
of the DAS.
Criterion:
Concurrent:
No studies have examined the concurrent validity
of the DAS.
Predictive:
No studies have examined the predictive validity
of the DAS.
Construct:
Convergent/Discriminant:
No studies have examined the convergent/discriminant validity
of the DAS.
Known Groups:
No studies have examined the known groups validity
of the DAS.
Sensitivity/ Specificity:
No studies have examined the sensitivity
/specificity of the DAS.
Responsiveness
Brashear et al. (2002) investigated the effect of Botulinum Toxin A on arm flexor spasticity
in 126 patients with stroke
of the DAS was not formally assessed in this study, the scale was sensitive enough to detect an improvement in function following botox treatment.
References
- Brashear, A., Gordon, M.F., Elovic, E., Kassicieh, V.D., Marciniak, C., Do, M., Lee, C-H, Jenkins, S. et al. (2002). Intramuscular injection of botulinum toxin for the treatment of wrist and finger spasticity after a stroke. New England Journal of Medicine, 347(6), 395-400.
- Brashear, A., Zafonte, R., Corcoran, M., Galvez-Jimenez, N., Gracies, J-M., Gordon, M.F., et al. (2002). Inter- and Intrarater reliability of the Ashworth Scale and the Disability Assessment Scale in patients with upper-limb poststroke spasticity. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 83, 1349-1351.
See the measure
Further information on the DAS can be found in the following publication
Brashear, A., Zafonte, R., Corcoran, M., Galvez-Jimenez, N., Gracies, J-M., Gordon, M.F., et al. (2002). Inter- and Intrarater reliability
of the Ashworth Scale and the Disability Assessment Scale in patients with upper-limb poststroke spasticity
. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 83, 1349-1351.